--- title: 7Scholar | Source-grounded document workflow for medical writing description: Bring client materials, evidence, document structure, source-traced drafting, review, citations, and Word delivery into one connected medical-writing workflow. route: / keywords: - medical writing workflow - source-traced drafting - evidence traceability - scientific writing - medical communications --- # Source-grounded medical writing you can defend. Turn client inputs and literature into a traceable draft where every claim is linked to its source. **Private. No model training.** ## One workspace. All deliverables. ### All deliverables in one workspace. For diverse and source-heavy medical communications. #### Regulatory writings Structure and author regulatory submission documents with complete source-grounding and audit readiness. - Clinical Study Report - CTD Module 2 Dossier - Clinical Protocol & SAP - Investigator Brochure - Device Clinical (CER) - IVD Performance (PER) - Risk Management Plan - DSUR & PSUR Reports #### Publications Turn evidence, data, and author input into a coherent scientific story that is ready for submission and congress. - Primary trial manuscript - Narrative review article - RWE manuscript - Secondary/Ad-hoc manuscript - Congress abstract & poster - Plain language summary #### Medical affairs Activate the same evidence story across client- and field-facing materials without losing scientific consistency. - Core scientific narrative - Ad board briefing book - Ad board summary report - MSL slide decks - Standard response doc (SRD) - Objection handlers - Medical information letters ## Draft · Verify · Defend ### A defensible draft with evidence attached. Every claim stays connected to the supporting evidence or literature. #### Draft excerpt The worked example below shows a generated passage about combination therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Each claim carries an evidence anchor: a source-traceability link to a TFL row and a protocol section, and a formal publication citation. Opening a claim shows its exact source, marked as verified. - **Preceding** — …consistent efficacy was observed across prespecified subgroups regardless of disease burden. - **Claim** — Combination therapy reduced mortality (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57–0.80) versus ADT alone. - **Claim** — Overall survival was the primary endpoint. - **Claim** — Consistent with earlier docetaxel evidence. - **Following** — Sensitivity analyses excluding early censoring produced concordant estimates across subgroups… #### TFL.xlsx - **Kind** — trace - **Locator** — Table 14.2 · row 22 - **Value** — HR 0.68 (0.57–0.80) - **Passage** — Overall survival — hazard ratio 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57–0.80); P<0.001. - **Anchor** — Source link #### Protocol.docx - **Kind** — trace - **Locator** — §8.1 Endpoints - **Passage** — The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. - **Anchor** — Source link #### Smith MR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2022 - **Kind** — citation - **Locator** — Reference 1 - **Passage** — Darolutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel significantly increased overall survival versus placebo. - **Anchor** — Publication citation ## Security & Privacy ### Confidential by default. protected by design. Your data remains isolated to your workspace and never used to train models. #### Your work never trains a model. Not ours, and not the model providers'. Your sources, project instructions, and drafts stay yours alone, so you can use 7Scholar with confidential material without giving it away. - No model training - EU data stored in the EEA #### GDPR Compliant For all EU users, data is stored within the European Economic Area under the GDPR. AI processing runs through contracted providers, which may operate outside the EEA under appropriate safeguards. #### Private to your workspace Authentication, authorization, and workspace-level controls keep project material separated and available only to your authorized users. #### Deletion you can rely on After account deletion, your account and document data is purged within 30 days. AI providers we use for processing may retain data under their own contractual terms — for example, Google's terms allow up to roughly 7 months for a deletion instruction to complete. ## How it works? ### 7Scholar functionalities #### Approve plan before drafting Review, edit, reorder, then approve or reject the proposed structure before drafting. #### Edit and write with AI Command AI to write and edit in a Word-like document alongside you. #### Follow established guidelines Review 7Scholar's suggested reporting guideline, or upload your own. #### Find supporting papers Review supporting literature 7Scholar finds and screens, then add approved papers to your project. #### Manage references Import your EndNote library for drafting, then export to Word with native EndNote citations. ## Who's in control? ### The medical writer is in control 7Scholar accelerates the work without taking over the judgment. #### Medical writer **You** decide what good looks like.\ 7Scholar follows. #### Evidence **You** choose the resourses.\ 7Scholar keeps every claim tied to them. #### Draft **You** set the message, structure, and level of scientific detail. 7Scholar drafts to your brief. #### Review & deliver **You** approve the structure and every change done under your direction. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### Everything medical writers need to know - Evidence stays inspectable - The writer approves the work - Your data is not used for training #### What does 7Scholar cover across a document project? 7Scholar keeps the project connected from evidence intake through delivery: bring together papers and client materials, organize and inspect sources, shape the document, develop a cited draft, review claims against their evidence, and move the finished work to Word with its references. #### How can I verify a drafted claim? Claims stay connected to their supporting evidence. You can inspect the cited paper passage or the relevant location in project material such as a protocol, SAP, or TFL, then decide whether the wording is accurate, appropriately qualified, and ready to keep. #### How does 7Scholar support scientific review? 7Scholar grounds drafting in the sources you select and makes the evidence trail visible, so the writer can challenge, edit, and approve every final claim. Scientific judgment and final sign-off remain with the team. #### Can I use confidential client or sponsor material? Your project data stays private and is not used for model training. Because client and sponsor policies differ, you should still follow the data-handling rules for each engagement. We can review 7Scholar's security and data practices with you or your team before a live project. #### What source material can I bring into a project? You can work from the mixed source packs medical writers actually receive, including journal articles, Word files, PDFs, TFLs and other spreadsheets, protocols, SAPs, client briefs, templates, reference libraries, and pasted context. #### Can I control the structure, guidelines, and revisions? Yes. You choose the evidence and review the document structure before drafting. You can apply relevant reporting guidance, add a client or journal template, edit the text directly, and accept or reject AI-proposed changes. 7Scholar assists the workflow; it does not lock the writer out of it. #### Will it fit my Word and reference-management workflow? 7Scholar is designed to work with the tools medical writers already use. Bring references into the project, manage citations alongside the draft, and move the deliverable back to Microsoft Word with its references. EndNote-compatible workflows are part of the source-to-delivery experience. #### Which medical-writing work is 7Scholar built for today? The current focus is source-heavy publications and medical communications work: journal manuscripts, literature and evidence reviews, scientific content, and related deliverables. Regulatory workflows are a deliberate next area, so we will be direct about fit before you start a project.