Who it's for
The same evidence. Different pressures.
Choose the source-grounded workflow that matches your team, reviewers, and deliverable.
Choose your team
One evidence engine for different teams.
Start with publication and medical-communications workflows; planned areas are clearly labelled.
Independent writers
1 audienceFor specialists who own the science and delivery.
Agency teams
2 audiencesFor teams balancing capacity, quality, and client trust.
Publications organizations
3 audiencesFor organizations coordinating evidence, writers, and review.
Publication teams
Keep the evidence story intact from source package to manuscript.
Explore workflowContract research organizations
Add traceability to publication and evidence-heavy writing.
Explore workflowPharma and biotech teams
Keep evidence consistent across internal and outsourced writing.
Explore workflowSpecialist evidence teams
2 audiencesFor workflows being shaped with design partners.
A consistent standard
Every deliverable needs its own evidence path.
Each format gets its own sources, structure, checks, and export.
What stays consistent
Across every audience and deliverable
- Approve the structure before drafting
- Review every proposed change
- Trace claims to citations or source context
- Keep uncertainty visible
- Export an editable, cited document
- Never train models on confidential content
Don't see your team?
Bring us the workflow.
We'll map the gaps and tell you if 7Scholar is ready.